Competition: Non-food retailers should review their contracts.

It is the last moment for non-food retailers to review contracts with their suppliers in order to adjust their provisions to the Unfair retailer practice prohibition law (“URPPL”), which will enter into force on 1 January 2016. Until then any relationship between suppliers and retailers is still being regulated by the Competition Law, which expressly prohibits abuse of dominance in retail trade (“ADR”). ADR mainly covered the retail industry’s food sector as the Competition Council (“CC”) has only once applied this legal concept towards non-food retailer, namely,  when it fined AS “Drogas”. Nevertheless, given the fact that our partners Debora Pāvila and Jūlija Jerņeva were actively involved in the discussions on drafting of URPPL, CC’s recently published guidelines on application of URPPL, we can foresee that at least one exemplary case will arise also in the non-food retail sector.

For more information in Latvian, please see our INSIDER.

by Debora Pāvila, Partner, Latvia

Related Lawyers

Gints Vilgerts

Partner, M&A

+371 29 107 768


Jūlija Jerņeva


+371 29 131 597


Related Experience

Successfully defending previous management board member in a litigation against one of the largest Latvian transport building factories. The claim for recovery of losses was brought due to company’s tax debt penalty EUR 0.13 Mio that was imposed for the period while the client held a position in company’s management board.

Providing legal assistance to Estonian company with enforcement of Estonian court’s decision of EUR 1.2 Mio debt recovery. On 7 June 2018 the district court satisfied client’s request and adopted a decision to enforce the Estonian court’s decision in Latvia.

Providing legal assistance to a real estate investment fund in an ongoing litigation against one of the subcontractors for violations in design and construction process which afterwards caused partial collapse of shopping mall’s ceiling. The amount of claim EUR 8.5 Mio.

Representing one of the largest Latvian construction companies in an ongoing litigation against Airport of Riga regarding the failure to pay for construction works. The amount of claim is EUR 0.5 Mio.