Competition law: Supreme Court unexpectedly clears the way for damages claims against the banks.

The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Administrative District Court permitting a ca.EUR 7.8 mio fine on 22 Latvian banks for violations of competition rules. The Supreme Court ruled contrary to the findings of the Court of Justice of the European Union's MasterCard judgment. The CJEU found that the banks' prohibited agreement was that of the effects. The Supreme Court found an agreement of object between the banks. The banks are now facing notable fines and potential damages claims. Claimants have launched such claims before courts in other EU Member States and the U.S. For more information in Latvian, please see our INSIDER.

by Jūlija Jerņeva, Partner, Latvia

Related Lawyers

Gints Vilgerts

Partner, M&A

+371 29 107 768

gints.vilgerts@vilgerts.comEmail

Jūlija Jerņeva

Partner

+371 29 131 597

julija.jerneva@vilgerts.comEmail

Related Experience

Successfully defending owner of an airport hangar against claim brought by construction company regarding the owner’s refusal to pay for the defective construction works. On 14 January 2019 the district court adopted a judgement in favour of the client, which became effective as of 5 February 2019.

Representing an aviation company in an ongoing litigation regarding the repayment of investments. The company who received the funds later transferred its’ business in several coordinated transactions to a related company, and thereafter became insolvent. The client brought a claim against the recipient of the borrower’s business pursuant to Article 20 of Commercial Law.

Defended a department store before the Consumer Rights Protection Centre in alleged price display breach for loyal customers.

Audit the compliance of a media company’s digital and analogue marketing practices with GDPR and the draft ePrivacy regulation.

Instagram