Seller’s liability in M&A transactions

Publication in magazine Bilances Juridiskie Padomi / No. 5 (71), May 2019

Contractual Limitations of Seller's Liability in Business Sales Transactions (M&A)

If the buyer timely prepares agreement terms that are acceptable to him or are in line with the established practice, the seller will have less corrections to make, which will contribute to the effectiveness of the negotiations.

One of the negotiation topics in each business sales process is the seller's liability and its boundaries. This issue is relevant, and not only in the context of the agreement text. In fact, it should be addressed as soon as a decision to start the sales or acquisition process of a company (its shares) is made.

An accurate description of the seller's liability in the agreement text is to some extent beneficial to both parties. Thus, the rules of the game are defined in the event that the seller, for example, fails to fulfil his obligations or provides false representations regarding the company’s position. The agreement text, of course, should be assessed together with what is not expressly stated in the agreement. In fact, what’s not expressly stated in the agreement is sometimes more important than what is stated.

Read the whole article here

by Vairis Dmitrijevs, Head of M&A, Latvia

Related Lawyers

Vairis Dmitrijevs

Head of M&A

+371 29 258 370

vairis.dmitrijevs@vilgerts.comEmail

Gints Vilgerts

Partner, M&A

+371 29 107 768

gints.vilgerts@vilgerts.comEmail

Related Experience

Representing a Latvian top 15 company in an ongoing collective dispute with several trade unions. The dispute concerns the interpretation of the rules that determine the amount of compensation that employees may claim in case of business trips or work travel trips.

Representing the client before the State Employment Inspectorate regarding alleged discrimination of employees on the grounds of family status. The case shall clarify, whether employees must issue health insurance to employees, who are on parental leave.

Successfully defending owner of an airport hangar against claim brought by construction company regarding the owner’s refusal to pay for the defective construction works. On 14 January 2019 the district court adopted a judgement in favour of the client, which became effective as of 5 February 2019.

Representing an aviation company in an ongoing litigation regarding the repayment of investments. The company who received the funds later transferred its’ business in several coordinated transactions to a related company, and thereafter became insolvent. The client brought a claim against the recipient of the borrower’s business pursuant to Article 20 of Commercial Law.

Instagram