Cosmetic product labelling requirements in EU

It is essential to ensure that your cosmetic products comply with the European Union (EU) labelling requirements. Correct labelling is an important part of a cosmetic product, as it helps to convey information about the product such as list of ingredients, its intended use, directions for use and any precautions to be observed. Incorrect cosmetic product labelling could lead to products being withdrawn from the market or recalled from end users.

The legislation that covers the labelling requirements in the EU is the Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 which lists very specific requirements for cosmetic product labelling on the EU market. In order to ensure that your products comply with the labelling requirements, you must observe the legal requirements as indicated in Article 19 of the Cosmetics Regulation. It provides that cosmetic products shall be made available on the market only where the container and packaging of cosmetic products bear the following information in indelible, easily legible and visible lettering:

  • Function of the cosmetic product.
  • The name and address of the responsible person placing the product on the market.
  • The country of origin if the product is imported from countries outside of the EU.
  • Nominal content. Exemptions apply to small volumes, free samples, single-application packs or packages containing a number of items.
  • For products with a minimum durability equal to or below 30 months, the date of minimum durability must be stated preceded by the words “best used before the end of” or by the hourglass symbol.
  • For products with a minimum durability above 30 months, the period after opening (PAO) must be indicated by the open jar symbol. Exemptions apply to certain product types.
  • Precautions for use.
  • Batch number.
  • A full list of ingredients. This information may be indicated on the packaging alone. The list shall be preceded by the term ‘ingredients’. If the packaging is too small to include this information a leaflet or tag can be enclosed, and this must be referred to by specific wording or by the open book symbol. Specific rules apply to soap, bath balls and other small products. Moreover, certain information on the label needs to be translated into local language.

It is important for manufacturers and distributors of cosmetic products to be aware of consequences of non-compliance. According to the RAPEX (the European Commission’s Rapid Alert System), which is a public list of dangerous products found across Europe, several cosmetic products have appeared in this system due to non-compliance related to product labelling. Products appearing in this list are subsequently withdrawn from the market, recalled from end users or their import is rejected at the border. Based on the market surveillance, non-compliance with cosmetic product labelling requirements is mainly the result of incomplete ingredient lists, misleading directions for use or inadequate instructions and warnings being stated on the label. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that cosmetic products are in line with the labelling requirements indicated in the Cosmetics Regulation.

by Erika Budaite, Associate,

Related Experience

Defended a department store before the Consumer Rights Protection Centre in alleged price display breach for loyal customers.

Helped an energy company to explore ways of overturning the regulators ruling that the transmission system operator was not independent of its shareholders. The main challenge in the case was focusing on the fiduciary duties of the client’s management in managing the company while the shareholders are creating a conflict of interest and compliance risks.

Successfully defending owner of an airport hangar against claim brought by construction company regarding the owner’s refusal to pay for the defective construction works. On 14 January 2019 the district court adopted a judgement in favour of the client, which became effective as of 5 February 2019.

Representing an aviation company in an ongoing litigation regarding the repayment of investments. The company who received the funds later transferred its’ business in several coordinated transactions to a related company, and thereafter became insolvent. The client brought a claim against the recipient of the borrower’s business pursuant to Article 20 of Commercial Law.