News
AML challenges and risks in the Baltics
ACAMS Baltic Chapter – Inaugural Estonia Event The ACAMS Baltic Chapter conference focused on the money laundering (ML) and terrorism financing (TF) challenges and risks in the Baltics. Such as regulatory collaboration, increased regulatory oversight, emerging risks and when can...
New edition of The Law Reviews Latvia is out now
The chapter about Latvia of Fourth Real Estate M&A and Private Equity Review now available for reading or downloading here: The Real Estate M&A and Private Equity Review | 2019 The chapter about Latvia of The Law Reviews publication was prepared...
Jūlija Jerņeva joins the European Commission pool of experts group
We are proud to announce that Jūlija Jerņeva has been appointed as a pool expert in the field of Legal Migration in the European Commission.
‘Cautious optimism’ continues to characterize Baltic M&A market...
FORBES Latvia | October M&A as a strategic element Investment funds are still a dominant factor that determines the M&A market activity in the Baltic countries, and no changes in this regard can be expected in the near future. It...
Related Experience
Providing legal assistance to one of the largest Latvian glass manufacturers in a cross-border dispute with Italian company regarding the delivered goods. On 26 June 2019 the court satisfied client’s request to ensure the claim by seizing the debtor’s financial means in Italy.
June 26, 2019
Representing a marine insurance company in litigation against a Latvian retailer regarding the retailer’s failure to pay for the delivered goods according to United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.
April 25, 2019
Representing a Latvian top 15 company in an ongoing collective dispute with several trade unions. The dispute concerns the interpretation of the rules that determine the amount of compensation that employees may claim in case of business trips or work travel trips.
March 7, 2019
Representing the client before the State Employment Inspectorate regarding alleged discrimination of employees on the grounds of family status. The case shall clarify, whether employees must issue health insurance to employees, who are on parental leave.
February 15, 2019