The future of privacy: notes from #DCP18

In the near future we will have the choice to board an airplane in 15min if we agree on biometrical recognition through the airport and at the gate. We may also agree to buy tickets to big events based only on facial recognition and use the face to get in. The post-truth world will advance into an age where we all can verify the source of a picture or video due to a unique token attached to it. Moreover, we should be able to haggle with social media and other companies about the value of the data we want to sell them and when.

Europe’s only asset after the digital revolution have turned out to be the personal data of the consumers in the biggest market in the world. We are still looking for ways to monetize them.

While we’re at it, the supervisory bodies and controllers have a lot of work to do to make the future GDPR compliant.

by Katrīne Pļaviņa, Attorney-at-law, Latvia

Related Lawyers

Katrīne Pļaviņa

Attorney-at-law

+371 26 164 110

katrine.plavina@vilgerts.comEmail

Kalīne Ozola

Associate

+371 27 542 967

kaline.ozola@vilgerts.comEmail

Elīza Grīnvalde

Associate / AML specialist (CAMS)

+371 22 403 488

eliza.grinvalde@vilgerts.comEmail

Related Experience

Providing legal assistance to one of the largest Latvian glass manufacturers in a cross-border dispute with Italian company regarding the delivered goods. On 26 June 2019 the court satisfied client’s request to ensure the claim by seizing the debtor’s financial means in Italy.

Representing a marine insurance company in litigation against a Latvian retailer regarding the retailer’s failure to pay for the delivered goods according to United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.

Representing a Latvian top 15 company in an ongoing collective dispute with several trade unions. The dispute concerns the interpretation of the rules that determine the amount of compensation that employees may claim in case of business trips or work travel trips.

Representing the client before the State Employment Inspectorate regarding alleged discrimination of employees on the grounds of family status. The case shall clarify, whether employees must issue health insurance to employees, who are on parental leave.

Instagram